Most American and British leftists are pharma shills because they are controlled by propaganda media controlled by the intel community, which is in bed with pharma.
Your risk-benefit analysis is clueless. All the HCQ studies, randomized, in early treatment, those taking HCQ did better than those taking placebo. “by chance."
If you had any concern about RCTs reaching statistical significance, double blind, impact journal, you would be begging all doctors to use fluvoxamine instead of Paxlovid and Remdesivir.
Of course there's statistical significance in Skipper, even if it's not conclusive enough to reject the Null Hypothesis. Most likely Skipper was underpowered.
For you, RJ.
To understand OBS and RCTs.
https://filiperafaeli.substack.com/p/hydroxychloroquine-the-world-has?s=w
RJ, I am a leftist. An old-fashioned left. Leninist. Who still criticizes the power of big corporations.
You are so unqualified that you don't know if the study is on early treatment or hospitalized.
Those two meta-analyses there include hospitalized (and overdosing) patients.
Your talk lacks science.
Most American and British leftists are pharma shills because they are controlled by propaganda media controlled by the intel community, which is in bed with pharma.
Skipper
Hospitalization:
HCQ = 4 of 231
Placebo = 8 of 234
50% less.
P=0.29
Mitja
Hospitalization:
HCQ = 8 of 136
Placebo = 11 of 157
16.0% lower
p = 0.64
If you look at this data, and say "it does not work", you are an idiot.
Thanks for reading.
Skipper was underpowered to conclusively (0.05) reject the Null Hypothesis.
Your risk-benefit analysis is clueless. All the HCQ studies, randomized, in early treatment, those taking HCQ did better than those taking placebo. “by chance."
If you had any concern about RCTs reaching statistical significance, double blind, impact journal, you would be begging all doctors to use fluvoxamine instead of Paxlovid and Remdesivir.
You are a sellout to big pharma.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2790742
Of course there's statistical significance in Skipper, even if it's not conclusive enough to reject the Null Hypothesis. Most likely Skipper was underpowered.
Too bad you don't understand statistics.